A comparison of Google Scholar, Fastcase, Casemaker, LexisNexis, WestlawNext, and Bloomberg

A great resource for lawyers and law students by by Carole A. Levitt and Mark Rosch.  Their findings may surprise you.

The premise:

We also thought it would be a good opportunity to compare three of the most popular free and low-cost case law databases (Google Scholar, Fastcase, Casemaker) and their citator services, with the more expensive databases (LexisNexis, WestlawNext, and
Bloomberg) and their citator services. It goes without saying that Google Scholar, Fastcase, Casemaker’s citators do not provide the editorial comment that LexisNexis, WestlawNext, and Bloomberg do. Instead, we were focusing on how well each citator worked. We decided to use the 2010 Tienda case for our test case to see if each citator listed the same citing opinions to Tienda. And, of
course, we wanted to learn if the 2010 Tienda case was still good law.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: